Typical Git workflow: Difference between revisions

From RidgeRun Developer Wiki
mNo edit summary
Line 3: Line 3:
Normal workflow is to develop and check in on a branch, then once everything is happy, merge the branch back into the master.  
Normal workflow is to develop and check in on a branch, then once everything is happy, merge the branch back into the master.  


== References<br> ==
== References<br> ==


<span style="line-height: 1.5em;">[[ https://confluence.atlassian.com/display/STASH/Basic+Git+commands |https://confluence.atlassian.com/display/STASH/Basic+Git+commands]]</span>
<span style="line-height: 1.5em;">[https://confluence.atlassian.com/display/STASH/Basic+Git+commands https://confluence.atlassian.com/display/STASH/Basic+Git+commands]</span>  


[[ http://rogerdudler.github.io/git-guide/ |http://rogerdudler.github.io/git-guide/]]
[http://rogerdudler.github.io/git-guide/ http://rogerdudler.github.io/git-guide/]  


[http://robert-reiz.com/2011/10/01/git-add-commit-push-pull/ http://robert-reiz.com/2011/10/01/git-add-commit-push-pull/]
[http://robert-reiz.com/2011/10/01/git-add-commit-push-pull/ http://robert-reiz.com/2011/10/01/git-add-commit-push-pull/]

Revision as of 21:10, 11 September 2013

Introduction

Normal workflow is to develop and check in on a branch, then once everything is happy, merge the branch back into the master.

References

https://confluence.atlassian.com/display/STASH/Basic+Git+commands

http://rogerdudler.github.io/git-guide/

http://robert-reiz.com/2011/10/01/git-add-commit-push-pull/

Typical Workflow are as follows

1) get local copy of code
2) create a branch
3) edit files
4) add/commit changes to local machine
5) get back in sync with changes commited by others
6) push branch to remote git repository
7) merge local branch into local master
8) push local master to remote git repostiory


1) Get a local copy of the code